On Nov 28, 2007 2:37 PM, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 28/11/2007, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If an admin refuses to publicly reveal the
reasons for blocking
someone, one alternative is to reveal them to the Arbitration
Committee, which she did.
Can you show that there is community consensus in support of this power grab?
First you show me that there is community consensus in support of your
endless cryptic non-sequiturs.