Exactly. As I have been through the arbitration process, I can claim
from experience that evidence is selectively (is "arbitrarily" a better
word?) applied in order to justify a "remedy" that the arbitrators are
already biased towards.
David Gerard wrote:
On 27/04/07, Blu Aardvark
<jeffrey.latham(a)gmail.com> wrote:
But seriously, my opinion is based on my
experience.
As a banned user.