Exactly. As I have been through the arbitration process, I can claim from experience that evidence is selectively (is "arbitrarily" a better word?) applied in order to justify a "remedy" that the arbitrators are already biased towards.
David Gerard wrote:
On 27/04/07, Blu Aardvark jeffrey.latham@gmail.com wrote:
But seriously, my opinion is based on my experience.
As a banned user.