On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Ryan Delaney <ryan.delaney(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Charles Matthews
<
charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
You're right that the original proposal failed to achieve it's goals, but
given that it is a good idea, that's no reason to
abandon it. The issue
here
should be whether it's a good idea or not and why.
I think this is a good idea, and that it has passive support from people now
but isn't on people's minds. It's always hard to get people to implement a
plan significantly different from the status quo... I'm not sure we are
closer to that tipping point now than before, meaning that it would take
someone to campaign for such a change, and address complaints and challenges
levied against it.
SJ