On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:20:46 +0100, Kirill Lokshin
<kirill.lokshin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/23/06, Philip Welch
<wikipedia(a)philwelch.net> wrote:
On Mar 23, 2006, at 9:47 AM, Kirill Lokshin
wrote:
On 3/23/06, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
An interesting point that came up in conversation
with presroi on
IRC. Compare:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1974
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/1974
Anyone interested in writing up our year articles as decent history
articles, as well as the lists of stuff?
Clever approach (usually seen in published yearbooks), but the
by-country breakdown at the core of it won't really work for years
where major (for some suitably vague definition of major) things
happen, like 1942.
You can add a separate section, like "World War II", for those
occurrences.
You can; but that section, if it were anything other than a list,
would be redundant with the corresponding section in [[World War II]].
I would think just a couple of sentences followed by {{main|World War II}}
or simmilar would be sufficient in such cases.
--
[[User:Sherool]]