On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:20:46 +0100, Kirill Lokshin kirill.lokshin@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/23/06, Philip Welch wikipedia@philwelch.net wrote:
On Mar 23, 2006, at 9:47 AM, Kirill Lokshin wrote:
On 3/23/06, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
An interesting point that came up in conversation with presroi on IRC. Compare:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1974 http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/1974
Anyone interested in writing up our year articles as decent history articles, as well as the lists of stuff?
Clever approach (usually seen in published yearbooks), but the by-country breakdown at the core of it won't really work for years where major (for some suitably vague definition of major) things happen, like 1942.
You can add a separate section, like "World War II", for those occurrences.
You can; but that section, if it were anything other than a list, would be redundant with the corresponding section in [[World War II]].
I would think just a couple of sentences followed by {{main|World War II}} or simmilar would be sufficient in such cases.