On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:27:35 -0800, "George Herbert"
<george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I am against deleting articles which are accurate
but not (yet) well
referenced. Fixing the references problem is a valid ongoing concern,
but I
don't see any reason to delete this article.
Last time, sure. This time, when it's still not fixed? I disagree.
I think we have a fuzzy-boundary problem with neologisms.
I think that deleting this is not the ultimate right answer.
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com