On 8/3/07, Armed Blowfish
<diodontida.armata(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On 03/08/07, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/08/07, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
>
> > If anything, getting involved in arguments like this actually
increases
> > my editing output. I find that doing
large amounts of repetitive and
> > uncontroversial work, such as categorization, format tidying,
reference
> > markup, etc., is a great way to work
off the frustration and
annoyance.
I don't _like_ it, though, so I wouldn't
exactly recommend it as a
motivator.
A proposal: everyone who posted to this discussion must fix up ten
articles from each of [[Category:Cleanup]] and [[Category:Category
needed]]. Including me.
- d.
Erm, hi, banned user here.
Armed Blowfish
Pick one or two goodies (perferably in the sciences) and send me them
plus a single good source for each that would help clean them up, and
I will do two clean-ups in penance for you.
I'm going to write a really good article from scratch as my own
penance, because that would be more fun and confer more glory upon me.
KP
Thanks, but I've already put far too much blood, sweat, and tears into
Wikipaedia, and I don't believe it's been appreciated... although
perhaps now is not the best time to talk about that. In any case,
I've said what I've said to help people, and I don't think I've been
entirely unsuccessful.
Armed Blowfish