On 5/13/06, Anthony DiPierro <wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
The point is, those of you claiming that this CSD is an edict from
above have so far provided no evidence that it actually is. In fact,
after looking further, someone on that page made the claim that Jimbo
has explicitly stated that it's *not* an edict from above.
I don't think that's a correct statement. In the event that it is, I
suggest that you examine finding of fact 2 in the Tony Sidaway
arbitration.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Tony_Sidawa…
This probably won't satisfy you because you don't recognise Jimbo's
authority or the Arbitration Committee's authority. However that is
not a problem for those of us who do.