On 5/13/06, Anthony DiPierro wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
The point is, those of you claiming that this CSD is an edict from above have so far provided no evidence that it actually is. In fact, after looking further, someone on that page made the claim that Jimbo has explicitly stated that it's *not* an edict from above.
I don't think that's a correct statement. In the event that it is, I suggest that you examine finding of fact 2 in the Tony Sidaway arbitration.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Tony_Sidaway...
This probably won't satisfy you because you don't recognise Jimbo's authority or the Arbitration Committee's authority. However that is not a problem for those of us who do.