On 24/01/2008, Shmuel Weidberg <ezrawax(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 23, 2008 6:43 AM, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 23/01/2008, Rama Rama
<ramaneko(a)gmail.com> wrote (on commons-l):
> 2) There is definitely a trend of professional photographers to request
> credits under the image in articles. This is what they are accustomed to.
> I (and a few others) think that we should make efforts to sensibilise our
> users to this. We can definitely afford to credit people in articles. This
> is a small concession which costs us very little and can benefit us greatly.
I think articles should also be attributed to their authors in the
body of the article. Every major encyclopedia does it. Certainly there
would be some debate about how much of a contribution should be
required for attribution, and what form the attribution should take,
whether real full names, wikipedia nicks, or real full initials.
The big problem is working out who to credit. I've been trying to
answer that question, and have failed completely - no system I've come
up with would be anywhere near fair. As for how to attribute - it has
to be by pseudonym since that's all we know, if people want to be
credited under their real name they need to sign up under their real
name, or get renamed to it.