-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Steve Summit wrote:
Heebie wrote:
...The article is fundamentally flawed - you can
see it contradicts
itself with no other knowledge or figures to hand.
They say that "The bulk of Wikipedia is written by 1400 obsessed freaks
who do little else but contribute to the site", but then go on to say
that "The bulk of the original content on Wikipedia is contributed by
tens of thousands of outsiders...
My impression was that the first paragraph was an attention-
getting "teaser". He was not trying to say that the bulk of
Wikipedia is written by 1400 obsessed freaks. He was instead
trying to suggest that there's a claim that the bulk of Wikipedia
is written by 1400 obsessed freaks (but the claim is wrong).
Quite right. Basic reading skills would reveal the article follows the
standard formulate - 'Claim, investigation, claim affirmed or
debunked'.
"Curious and skeptical, I decided to investigate...."
"Wales seems to think that the vast majority of users are just doing
the first two (vandalizing or contributing small fixes) while the core
group of Wikipedians writes the actual bulk of the article. But that's
not at all what I found...."
"In other words, if you use Wales's methods, you get Wales's results:
most of the content seems to be written by heavy editors."
"With the more reasonable metric -- indeed, the one Wales himself said
he planned to use in the next revision of his study -- the result
completely reverses."
"When you put it all together, the story become clear: an outsider
makes one edit to add a chunk of information, then insiders make
several edits tweaking and reformatting it. In addition, insiders rack
up thousands of edits doing things like changing the name of a
category across the entire site -- the kind of thing only insiders
deeply care about. As a result, insiders account for the vast majority
of the edits. But it's the outsiders who provide nearly all of the
content."
And so on. It's a careless reader indeed who concludes that the
article contradicts itself.
- --
gwern
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREKAAYFAklgHu4ACgkQvpDo5Pfl1oLeHQCffR1bzs4LlZJzHwJ48RGQuU73
68QAnRBl4qPL9TMTItYYg1fm3xC7QYDV
=zqJA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----