<WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
This is how I do it. If in "Plankton" we
have only one other thing
named planton, then we shouldn't have a disamg page just for
two items. That seems overkill. So in that case SB_Plankton
makes sense.
Repeat: "And four years isn't too long I suppose for
those people to finally get the notion that **trivial disambiguations
are unencyclopedic.** Fugly too."
Generally speaking we try to be an encyclopedia. That means its not an
issue of "a trade-off in having too many clicks."
-Stevertigo
PS: Thanks for getting back on topic here.