Correction: Not slippery slope...just annoying :\
On 2/7/06, Ilya N. <ilyanep(a)gmail.com> wrote:
But it removes the slippery slope argument of "Why this and not that?"
Babel is the only box I've seen that can be directly tied to
On 2/7/06, MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/7/06, The Cunctator
> On 2/6/06, Ilya N. <ilyanep(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm afraid I must agree.
> > As an editor of 3 years I must ask what happened to writing an
> > How come we become more about community just because we're in the
> > internet sites?
> > I must say that the community has started trudging along and
venomous over the last few months to a year.
If it were me I'd say delete all userboxes except for the babels and
that users spend more attention on articles and
meta issues relating
> to articles
There's nothing wrong with the occasional userbox. There's a number of
on my user and apart from copyright issues with
the images involved,
them really caused me any problems. religious and
have their place as well. They tell you where
people's expertise lies.
It's boxes about someone's beliefs that probably need to go. Those are
ones that cause a division (with people who
Besides, I don't see the use in setting up a userbox for each little
We've got Template:Userbox which anyone can
alter and subst: into their
userspace. No need for all those separate templates.
WikiEN-l mailing list
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
(My website; DarkLordFoxx Media)
- Track your money's travels.