On 18/02/2008, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
To do that, you need to define what the sides are. We're never going to completely satisfy everybody. The most unreasonable claims can obviously be rejected outright (for example, someone mentioned a demand that only Muslims be allowed to edit Islam-related articles). We need to decide how unreasonable is unreasonable enough to dismiss without consideration.
Of course that presupposes that they are being unreasonable which in itself is a value judgement.
How do we make value judgements in the wikipedia?
What do we value? (This is not a rhetorical question).