On 18/02/2008, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
To do that, you need to define what the sides are.
We're never going
to completely satisfy everybody. The most unreasonable claims can
obviously be rejected outright (for example, someone mentioned a
demand that only Muslims be allowed to edit Islam-related articles).
We need to decide how unreasonable is unreasonable enough to dismiss
without consideration.
Of course that presupposes that they are being unreasonable which in
itself is a value judgement.
How do we make value judgements in the wikipedia?
What do we value? (This is not a rhetorical question).
--
-Ian Woollard
We live in an imperfectly imperfect world. If we lived in a perfectly
imperfect world things would be a lot better.