On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:52 AM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2009/8/21 Tony Sidaway <tonysidaway(a)gmail.com>om>:
On 8/19/09, Carcharoth
<carcharothwp(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone else get annoyed by certain
hatlinks?
I don't see the problem here. Be bold and
remove crap, whether
pointless hatnotes or anything else.
It's an editorial issue. The two-item disambig is one workaround,
though more than two items is nice.
I don't know whether this is related, but the other day I found that the
article Vienne contained two separate hatnotes, one disambiguating the
French town of Vienne from the canton, and the other pointing to the article
on Vienna. I changed it to a two-item disambiguation relevant to the
context. I don't think this is a huge problem at all.