martin(a)myreddice.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
One of the things I disliked about h2g2 was that it
could take months to fix
documentation bugs (that's not figurative: actual months. In one instance, it's
been a
year since the problem was first reported, and it's still not fixed). On Wikipedia,
it's a
matter of minutes, nay seconds. That's great - let's not lose that.
This seems to parallel the point that I was making to illustrate
Wikipedia's primary competitive advantage over Britannica.
Ec