Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
Needless to say there is an edit war. Of course these facts are cited; but do we really need to know that he took campaign contributions from some guy and did not give them away like the other people who took the guy's money? Is that *honestly* the business of a neutral encyclopaedia article?
Seems like a balance issue rather than a BLP one, no? The facts are the facts, but given without proper expansion of other points doesn't create a BLP issue.
-Jeff