Can I just re-inforce this statement, to the effect that removing
infomation is not the core policy of wikipedia, but neither is the
spread of disinformation. Puhlease keep the distinction clear.
On 10/17/06, Jimmy Wales <jwales(a)wikia.com> wrote:
Jeff Raymond wrote:
Seems like a balance issue rather than a BLP one,
no? The facts are the
facts, but given without proper expansion of other points doesn't create
a BLP issue.
Without making any statement on this particular case, which I have not
studied enough, I just wanted to point out that a balance issue can and
often is a BLP issue. Indeed, BLP issues are more often about balance
than anything else.
It is often that case that the worst bios of living people involve a
skeleton bio with a huge puke of negative information (properly sourced)
in the middle, so that the article as a whole is completely biased.
Because of certain cultural norms against ever ever ever removing any
precious little tidbit of information, despite it boring the reader to
tears and being a form of attack and bias, it can be hard for people to
combat it.
Remember, NPOV is non-negotiable. Wikipedia is not a data dump.
Quality requires editorial judgment and good sense.
--Jimbo
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
--
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]