On 16 April 2013 14:20, Kathleen McCook <klmccook(a)gmail.com> wrote
I agree with you, Charles. These fallacies are quite
transparent. And it is
too bad that much good effort and input to the Wikipedia initiative can be
lost due to those who feel it is their to be "forthright" (wiggle word)
rather than helpful. There is nothing wrong with being helpful. There
is everything wrong with a nasty officious edge.
To be clear, I don't engage in these debates to diminish the
community. I come in as a "policy wonk" if I feel the policy involved
is being misread, too close to the letter. That's not the trouble
here.
Charles