On 04/07/07, Slim Virgin slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/4/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Um, no. I keep mentioning it as an example of the idiocy your proposed attitude leads to. In the best of faith. As such, it is relevant and I'll keep mentioning it because it is relevant. That it counts against your position is not a reason to suppress all mention of it.
The reason to stop mentioning it is that the person who did it regrets it and has apologized, so we should move on from that example. If it's really such a big problem, there will be other examples you can use instead.
That seems arbitrary and wikilawyerish. It's such a perfect example.
- d.