On 04/07/07, Slim Virgin <slimvirgin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/4/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Um, no. I keep mentioning it as an example of the
idiocy your proposed
> attitude leads to. In the best of faith. As such, it is relevant and
> I'll keep mentioning it because it is relevant. That it counts against
> your position is not a reason to suppress all mention of it.
The reason to stop mentioning it is that the person
who did it regrets
it and has apologized, so we should move on from that example. If it's
really such a big problem, there will be other examples you can use
instead.
That seems arbitrary and wikilawyerish. It's such a perfect example.
- d.