I am sorry I still do not get it.
1) Is your proposal going to completely hide "unfinished" articles from the
public? If so who will be able to see them? Admins? Users?
2) How would you decide which article is ready for public consumption or
not? A process like "requests for publishing"?
3) Isn't your proposal hiding all stubs as well as some other articles?
After all no stub by very definition is ready for "public consumption".
4) I am not "ready to accept" anything I am forced to accept. Your tone
implies I have no other choice to either accept your proposal or mass
deletions. Mass deletion itself has no consensus behind it and is
disruptive.
5) You seem to have a workable idea but perhaps need to organize thoughts a
bit.
- White Cat
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:47 AM, <WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 1/14/2009 12:38:27 AM Pacific Standard Time,
wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com writes:
What would that serve? I do not understand that!
Please help me understand what non-indexing stub articles will serve?
Wouldn't that hamper the entire point of stubs. We advertise via stub
templates to ask people to expand articles for a reason.>>
----------------------------------------
"No Indexing" is not related to "stub" or "not stub".
It's related to "the community has decided this article isn't ready for
public consumption"
The article could be a thousand words long and still not be ready.
This proposal is an alternative to mass deletions, and I would think you'd
be ready to accept any alternative to that.
Will Johnson
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
steps!
(
http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?redir=htt…
cemailfooterNO62<http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201…
)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l