Message: 2
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:35:53 +1000
From: Stephen Bain <stephen.bain(a)gmail.com
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Rogue Admin SlimVirgin Lying About Content in
justifying her block...
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org
Message-ID: <f30e42de050530233563ef4ada(a)mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 5/31/05, Cranston Snord <enviroknot(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
And now the Rogue Admin Slimvirgin lies some more...
"Actually, the four reverts had the same exact wording.Yuber(talk)
22:00, 30
May 2005 (UTC)
* Blocked for 24 hours. Yuber, thanks for providing the first edit as
well
as the first revert, which was very helpful.
SlimVirgin (talk) 22:05,
May
30, 2005 (UTC)"
If you click the two links, it is patently obvious that they are
different:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhimmi&diff=14439874&oldi…
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhimmi&diff=14451571&oldi…
Maybe so, but these four were all the same:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhimmi&diff=14451571&oldi…
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhimmi&diff=14457787&oldi…
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhimmi&diff=14458809&oldi…
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhimmi&diff=14461199&oldi…
That's clearly more than three reverts. Please stop debating this.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain(a)gmail.com
Mr. Bain also has a good point.