R E Broadley wrote:
The only link I've been given so far is the
[[Wikipedia:Disruptive
editing]] link. Have you seen any others, because I have certainly
not.
I think you can reasonably ask the ArbCom about this. "Disruptive
editing" is only a behavioural guideline: it mentions "This guideline
concerns gross, obvious and repeated violations of fundamental policies,
not subtle questions about which reasonable people may disagree." In
other words there should be more to it than a vague assertion of
"disruption".
Charles