R E Broadley wrote:
The only link I've been given so far is the [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing]] link. Have you seen any others, because I have certainly not.
I think you can reasonably ask the ArbCom about this. "Disruptive editing" is only a behavioural guideline: it mentions "This guideline concerns gross, obvious and repeated violations of fundamental policies, not subtle questions about which reasonable people may disagree." In other words there should be more to it than a vague assertion of "disruption".
Charles