On 5/4/07, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/4/07, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 5/4/07, Joe Szilagyi
<szilagyi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm just curious. Isn't it a technical violation of US law/DMCA to
link back
to pages
that include infringing material?
I don't think that has ever been decided in court one way or another.
But someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
It has.
It's illegal if you knowingly do so for the purpose of disseminating
the circumvention device.
The next important question then, I think, is would Wikipedia liable legally
if they served a DMCA takedown, and we did take it down? If the answer is
Yes, we'd be legally safe, then perhaps mentioning the string itself isn't a
risk. Maybe. Beyond that, the liability for posting/reposting would fall to
users and IPs that posted it?
--
Regards,
Joe
http://www.joeszilagyi.com