On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Oldak Quill oldakquill@gmail.com wrote:
2008/7/20 geni geniice@gmail.com:
2008/7/20 Oldak Quill oldakquill@gmail.com:
Although there are plenty of people turned-off and turned-away by the deletion of factually correct, verifiable and referenced articles. There is nothing quite as disheartnening as working on an article, only for a faceless gang of self-appointed AfDers to come along and decide that this article falls below an arbitrary threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia. My Wikipedia experience has been significantly soured by such arbitrary deletions and my efforts toward Wikipedia have fallen off recently as a result.
Getting a properly reffed article deleted is quite a trick.
If I knew that my work could survive at least in some form (a publicly-viewable deletion namespace with libel and slander removed, e.g.), perhaps I would allow myself to get more excited about working on Wikipedia again.
If you wrote it yourself there are no shortage of free webhosts on which it can survive.
The point isn't about a particular article ("my work" was a wrong expression to use here): it is to do with the efforts I put into editing Wikipedia and whether it is worth it. I've had problems with referenced, factually-accurate and verifiable articles that I have worked on being deleted due to questions to notability. It is also disheartening to go to AfD and see articles which are referenced, factually-accurate and verifiable being deleted due to notability.
-- Oldak Quill (oldakquill@gmail.com)
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
I can write a referenced, factually-accurate and verifiable (public records) article about my car or my dog, or for that matter myself. For quality control and undue weight reasons, we still shouldn't -have- those articles. That's why we ask "Has someone who is reliable on this subject and doesn't have any interest in promoting it written a significant amount about it?" It's really a reasonable question, and keeps a lot of garbage out. However, as always, one man's trash is another man's treasure, and if someone else would like to start up a project to put it -elsewhere-, be it fancruft on a Wikia or all-imaginable-kinds-of-cruft on some new project, that's just fine. It's just not allowed -on Wikipedia-, the Web's a big place, and (unless it's a copyvio, libel, or something else illegal), there's likely a place where it does fit in.