Carcharoth wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Carcharoth
<carcharothwp(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
<snip>
I would say the MilHist B-class criteria would be
a good minimum
standard).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Assessm…
* B1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate
inline citations.
* B2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious
omissions or inaccuracies.
* B3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or
more sections of content.
* B4. It is free from major grammatical errors.
* B5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an
infobox, images, or diagrams.
Should all BLPs meet that standard?
Simpler: they should be good stubs, not bad stubs. B5 is out-of-focus,
anyway. B2 is almost impossible to assess (a case of a BDP, but I
actually created two articles about the same person once, who had been a
professor on both sides of the Channel, as was pointed out by someone
looking over my shoulder from frWP).
Charles