On Nov 30, 2007 2:27 PM, Ken Arromdee <arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
Giano was not a party to the email, did not have
the consent of the
sender of the email to publish it, and did not respect the privacy
of the sender.
He sent the email to expose misconduct on the part of the sender. That makes
those points moot, as well as obviously being the reason arbcom is coming
down on him so hard for posting it. Nobody *likes* having their or their
friends' misconduct exposed.
Would it be possible for you to assume more bad faith? I doubt it.
Durova is not a "friend" of the arbcom, and the arbcom has made it
quite clear their issue with Giano has nothing to do with "exposing
their friends misconduct".