On Nov 30, 2007 2:27 PM, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
Giano was not a party to the email, did not have the consent of the sender of the email to publish it, and did not respect the privacy of the sender.
He sent the email to expose misconduct on the part of the sender. That makes those points moot, as well as obviously being the reason arbcom is coming down on him so hard for posting it. Nobody *likes* having their or their friends' misconduct exposed.
Would it be possible for you to assume more bad faith? I doubt it. Durova is not a "friend" of the arbcom, and the arbcom has made it quite clear their issue with Giano has nothing to do with "exposing their friends misconduct".