Aren't most recipes copyrighted?
RickK
Matthew Larsen mat.larsen@gmail.com wrote: I agree that recipies should be included in the main wikipedia - providing they are not stupid and do actually work. I would love to give a shot at cooking things (Delia Smith gets on my tits) and anything to help me learn to cook would be great.
This may lead to edit wars with people fiddling each others recipies, so this will have to be watched.
Mabye a wikirecipies site?
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 03:35:51 -0400, Sj 2.718281828@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:05:17 -0400, Delirium wrote:
I'd say a fairly high percentage of our articles on drugs have something that at least one government will find objectionable, so we'd have to tag pretty much all of them.
This might not be a terrible idea. It should be as easy as possible to provide various views of the encyclopedia which are inoffensive, in turn, to a) governments, b) children, c) the pious, etc. Giving reusers the ability to choose a limited subset of encyclopedia content is not censorship (though one might argue that it makes targeted censorship easier). I can think of a few cases in which I would find it appropriate to remove "a fairly high percentage of our articles on drugs," among other things, from a particular snapshot or CD.
+sj+
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l