blankfaze wrote:
So perhaps we should develop better election
procedure.
Perhaps we could scrap the election procedure and just have a simple
support/oppose vote whenever someone feels like running for it like we
do for admins?
I don't know that we really want or need that many arbitrators in the
system. If these elections seemed ugly, imagine what a perpetual
Requests for Arbitratorship would be like. Also, I think Arbcom
should develop an institutional memory so that its rulings are
consistent, and that would be hard to do with a fluid membership.
Charles (Mackensen)