--- Geoff Burling <llywrch(a)agora.rdrop.com> wrote:
Last time I ventured my two cents concerning the print
Wikipedia, the
response I got led me to conlcude that there was no support for forking
Wikipedia even in the slightest to make the content more acceptible -- which
is what any approval board would end up doing. Then the project seemed to go
into hibernation. Then it seemed that a group was working on it. Now it
appears we are back to discussing what should be done.
What? How do you come to that conclusion? There *will* be no fork at *all* -
the only thing that will be done is selecting one version of an article that is
approved in some way. Any future approved version would be based on the
development version (that is, a regular Wikipedia article which would be in
perpetual development), not the last stable version.
-- mav
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Shop for Back-to-School deals on Yahoo! Shopping.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/backtoschool