--- Geoff Burling llywrch@agora.rdrop.com wrote:
Last time I ventured my two cents concerning the print Wikipedia, the response I got led me to conlcude that there was no support for forking Wikipedia even in the slightest to make the content more acceptible -- which is what any approval board would end up doing. Then the project seemed to go into hibernation. Then it seemed that a group was working on it. Now it appears we are back to discussing what should be done.
What? How do you come to that conclusion? There *will* be no fork at *all* - the only thing that will be done is selecting one version of an article that is approved in some way. Any future approved version would be based on the development version (that is, a regular Wikipedia article which would be in perpetual development), not the last stable version.
-- mav
_______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Shop for Back-to-School deals on Yahoo! Shopping. http://shopping.yahoo.com/backtoschool