On 6/22/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:32:40 +1000, Mark Gallagher
<m.g.gallagher(a)student.canberra.edu.au> wrote:
It would be nice to be able to prevent certain
people from doing
obnoxious things without blocking them completely. We shouldn't have to
block otherwise sane users because of a minor foible.
Yes, absolutely. It could be a way of stopping things from
escalating, as they so often do when a full block is implemented.
It would give them a last chance to demonstrate good faith. Probably
worth doing as a trial at any rate, it's so hard to predict how these
things play out in reality.
Steve