On 6/22/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:32:40 +1000, Mark Gallagher m.g.gallagher@student.canberra.edu.au wrote:
It would be nice to be able to prevent certain people from doing obnoxious things without blocking them completely. We shouldn't have to block otherwise sane users because of a minor foible.
Yes, absolutely. It could be a way of stopping things from escalating, as they so often do when a full block is implemented.
It would give them a last chance to demonstrate good faith. Probably worth doing as a trial at any rate, it's so hard to predict how these things play out in reality.
Steve