'of a personal nature', i.e. I should not include people who
took pornographic pictures of themselves? I'm pretty sure
those pictures were deleted anyway, but even if they
weren't, I don't think so many people did that that it would
affect that statistics much. Or do you mean pictures only
used in userspace? Of course, those probably would have
been deleted when the banned user notice got stuck on
their user page.... And then if they are banned for something
relating to uploading images, all their images are likely
deleted.... Of course, it would be difficult to tell if these things
would influence the statistics much without actually doing the
study, I'm just wondering if it is worth the time to check, given
the subjective nature of the necessary judgements.
On 24/09/2007, Nick <heligolandwp(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
Armed,
If all the images they've uploaded are of a personal nature,
their own photograph or something we could never use, I'd
exclude those editors, anything else, whether it's used or
not would be fine for including. If they've been blocked for
something relating to uploading images, I'd put those users
into a seperate set of statistics.