'of a personal nature', i.e. I should not include people who took pornographic pictures of themselves? I'm pretty sure those pictures were deleted anyway, but even if they weren't, I don't think so many people did that that it would affect that statistics much. Or do you mean pictures only used in userspace? Of course, those probably would have been deleted when the banned user notice got stuck on their user page.... And then if they are banned for something relating to uploading images, all their images are likely deleted.... Of course, it would be difficult to tell if these things would influence the statistics much without actually doing the study, I'm just wondering if it is worth the time to check, given the subjective nature of the necessary judgements.
On 24/09/2007, Nick heligolandwp@googlemail.com wrote:
Armed,
If all the images they've uploaded are of a personal nature, their own photograph or something we could never use, I'd exclude those editors, anything else, whether it's used or not would be fine for including. If they've been blocked for something relating to uploading images, I'd put those users into a seperate set of statistics.