On 8/2/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 02/08/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Who asked for reversions to be oversighted? If I
missed those posts, I
apologize, but I don't recall seeing people ask for that.
David Gerard posted about being asked to do it. He told them to bugger off.
I've looked at David's post; that's not what he said.
"Some have been sending in such revs for oversighting, but have been
told quite clearly this isn't covered by the oversight policy."
Seems a pretty accurate summary to me.
Um, ok. It's not really an accurate summary, but anyway, it seems like
a pretty vague, off-the-cuff statement, about something that didn't
actually happen, requested by someone we don't know, and rejected by
someone else whose name is not revealed. So, why are we still going
over this, and *generating* drama where none apparently existed?