Possibly, who knows. But I call it an attack site bc whatever nice language
they use, it was expressly created to complain about admins.
On 6/27/07, James Farrar <james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 28/06/07, Daniel R. Tobias <dan(a)tobias.name> wrote:
On 27 Jun 2007 at 15:58:52 -0700, "Steven
Walling"
<steven.walling(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> This is totally asinine. It's just a personal attack site. At least
> Wikitruth is A: funny at times and B:actually contains recognized
criticisms
of
Wikipedia, not just personal vendettas.
So is it an "Attack Site", like in, you'll burn in Hell for eternity,
or at least deserve to be banned from Wikipedia as a troll, if you
commit the unpardonable sin of linking to it?
Have a look at the entries for the major proponents of BADSITES, and
then draw your own conclusions...
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l