On 11/28/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 1:22 PM, Alec Conroy
<alecmconroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It would have
been impossible to assess Durova's judgment (and lack
thereof) without actually seeing the evidence.
Who made you her judge and jury? The action has resulted in an ArbCom
case, the ArbCom is assessing it.
The community is the judge and jury of every admin action.
Particularly when there is an Request for Comments from the community.
Remember us-- the community? Every admin is theoretically supposed
to have our trust?
She has,
supposedly,
threatened to sue the foundation for copyright violation is the email
is published on-wiki, and that is a risk the foundation does not want
to take.
Has she? I wasn't aware of that.
Yeah-- supposedly foundation employee Bastique removed the material
based on Durova's copyright claims. If you were really crazy, you
could say she never claimed copyright-- (Bastique was part of
Durova's investigation list, so a cynic could say he did it as some
sort of cover up-- but I'm not that cynical myself. I'm sure she
really did assert copyright).
Besides, Durova has been repeatedly asked for permission to publish
the email on wiki, and has yet to grant it-- forcing anyone who wants
to speak intelligently about this subject to visit Wikitruth.
Alec