On 6/3/06, Sam Spade <samspade.thomasjefferson(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
The wikipedia is the injured party, I am meerly
insulted.
I'd agree with the former, but with a different slant. Your absolute
conviction of being Right and your unwillingness to discuss or
compromise when you've made up your mind hurts Wikipedia. Your use of
simple stubbornness to get your way injures Wikipedia. Your tendency
to see your personal biases as neutral impairs Wikipedia. Your
willingness to engage in interminable revert wars does not help
Wikipedia improve.
The question is, are you able to move beyond the soap
opera of
personalities to address the substantive issues?
When your opponent tries to address the issues, you address
personalities. When someone tries to address your personality and
behaviour, you dismiss this and insist on the issues.
And now you feel insulted that the arbcom is minded to hold you to a
standard of non-disruptiveness. Please.
-Matt