Jimmy Wales wrote:
Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
That would carry a lot of weight? That's the
most
baseless argument I've heard so far, that it's
unsourced. Almost all of Wikipedia is unsourced!
And almost all of Wikipedia is uncontested, too. One benefit of our
NPOV process is that at any given point in time, 99%+ of what is
written is something that everyone who isn't bonkers could agree with.
Not bonkers, yes. But see:
... an equally out-of-control Blomberg inspired crowd
(libertarians
mainly) who are convinced -- almost to the point of religious
princple
-- that global warming is a giant left-wing conspiracy and that Kyoto
was an anti-american plot (amongst whom, sadly, I number Ed Poor).
http://www.planetunreal.com/titanium