Jimmy Wales wrote:
Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
That would carry a lot of weight? That's the most baseless argument I've heard so far, that it's unsourced. Almost all of Wikipedia is unsourced!
And almost all of Wikipedia is uncontested, too. One benefit of our NPOV process is that at any given point in time, 99%+ of what is written is something that everyone who isn't bonkers could agree with.
Not bonkers, yes. But see:
... an equally out-of-control Blomberg inspired crowd (libertarians
mainly) who are convinced -- almost to the point of religious princple -- that global warming is a giant left-wing conspiracy and that Kyoto was an anti-american plot (amongst whom, sadly, I number Ed Poor).