If the rape is "notable" then there will necessarily be sources; if
not primary, secondary. If it is truly "notable" then it would have
been widely reported?
On 19/07/06, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/19/06, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Thoughts? I'm really not convinced we have
another way to deal with
things like this that actually works...
If the central claim to notability of a person (such as a notable
rape) cannot be verifiably established, we ought not have an article
on them. Probably the best is move the text to AFC, ask for a source,
and speedy the original under "no claim to notability". Kind of an
abuse of the system, though, if it's the same person that deleted the
previous claim to notability :)
Steve
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
Oldak Quill (oldakquill(a)gmail.com)