If the rape is "notable" then there will necessarily be sources; if not primary, secondary. If it is truly "notable" then it would have been widely reported?
On 19/07/06, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/19/06, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
Thoughts? I'm really not convinced we have another way to deal with things like this that actually works...
If the central claim to notability of a person (such as a notable rape) cannot be verifiably established, we ought not have an article on them. Probably the best is move the text to AFC, ask for a source, and speedy the original under "no claim to notability". Kind of an abuse of the system, though, if it's the same person that deleted the previous claim to notability :)
Steve _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l