On 6/18/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 6/18/07, K P <kpbotany(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 6/18/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 6/18/07, K P <kpbotany(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 6/18/07, elisabeth bauer <eflebeth(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > 2007/6/18, K P <kpbotany(a)gmail.com>om>:
> > > >
> > > > > I was attacked to get me to shut up. Certainly it was a
> > > > > well-orchestrated, well, maybe not that well since it wound up
being
> > > > > funny and ridiculous, but an attempt at a well-orchestrated gang
up to
> > > > > get me to shut up and stop editing because I had the nerve to
call
> > > > > someone on their bad conduct.
> > > > >
> > > > > This happens all the time to editors on Wikipedia.
> > > >
> > > > Could you please provide a link to your case so everybody can form
his
> > > > own opinion about it?
> > > >
> > > > greetings,
> > > > elian
> > > >
> > > It's on my talk page, links galore.
> >
> > But what is your editing name????? Where is your Talk: page?????
> >
> > > The issues raised about Jay were concerning his access to tools that
> > > gave him information (and Slim Virgin it appears) that others do not
> > > have access to.
> >
> > Evidence?
> >
> > > Both Slim and Jay revealed this information in RfAs,
> >
> > Where has Slim done so?
> >
> > > Both revealed this information in RfAs,
> >
> > Where has Slim done so?
> >
> > > If the policy is going to be enforced, don't enforce it at
politically
> > > charged times only. Enforce it all of the time.
> >
> > I do enforce it all the time. As I said, I block every open proxy I
> > come across. I've blocked dozens, perhaps hundreds. And *every* time
> > is politically charge on Wikipedia; frankly, especially now, when
> > people are letting bizarre conspiracy theories fly at the drop of the
> > hat, egged on by the banned trolls and WR, and other editors who make
> > all sorts of opaque and unsubstantiated claims, then refuse to explain
> > what they mean or back them up. And the latter refers to you, KP
> > Botany.
> >
> I do back up my claims. I send them in to the list all the time, just
> for you, all my little AfD links, like the assertion that American
> Polygraph Association should be deleted because it's not notable, like
> Rock climbing for deletion.
What is your editing name, where is your Talk: page?
>
> There are no opaque and unsubstantiated claims coming from me on this
> issue.
You claimed, more than once, that SlimVirgin had access to, and had
revealed, CheckUser information. What substantiation do you have for
that claim?
Not a claim, I thought she was the one who asked Armedblowfish why he
edited through a tor account?
No, *I* was the person who did so. That's what this is all about. I
would have hoped you would at least have looked at the RFA in question
before spouting even more wild accusations.
What did you say your userid was? Where can I find this Talk: page you
allege outlines some sort of cabal efforts against you?