On Dec 11, 2007 1:53 AM, Matthew Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 10:15 PM, Ken Arromdee
<arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
That works only for !!, not for future
recurrences of the same situation
involving other users. !!'s innocence was conclusively demonstrated
through the posting of an email that embarassed Durova, and which Durova
did her best to keep third parties from seeing.
I recall !! was unblocked significantly before that email was posted -
because some users knew that user's previous identity and because
people examined !!'s contribution history and found nothing
problematic.
Exactly. !! was exonerated 75 minutes after the blocking. The
publication of Durova's e-mail, many days later, was political drama
and ritual humiliation.